On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 05:18:16PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > and it is queried in quite a few places. Lilypond 1.8 seems like a > rather old version to support. > > Do we really need to have this around? Anybody even knows what it does?
IIRC, old-relative had to do with the behavior of relative octaves and repeats -- should the second alternative be based on the last note *before* the first alternative, or the last note *inside* the first alternative. I would rather postpone any discussion about keeping this until the GOP proposal on deprecation. Vaguely scheduled for Dec. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
