On Sep 17, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 17 September 2011 12:16, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> > wrote: > >> They should be applied separately - 5038042 fixes 1881, and 5057041 prunes >> down bloated code. There is a chance that 5057041 is effected by 5038042 (I >> haven't tested them together yet) though I doubt it. After their >> countdowns, I'd push 5038042 first, rerun regtests on 5057041, and then >> either push 5057041 or modify it if necessary. > > I wouldn't bother with a countdown for this patch. It's simple enough > to apply immediately. > > Cheers, > Neil
Pushed as 47f5cb2e80eca506ff4897b7628129597a60f5cb. Sorry for the critical regression from my work and thanks for your patience while I fixed it! Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
