On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:45:04AM +0000, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote: > I can't say I like this change: it makes a complex user > interface more complex. Shouldn't we be moving in the > opposite direction?
On general principle I agree, but I believe that this patch simply brings the docs in line with actual git master. I assume that the examples about stem length currently just do nothing. As such, I think we should go ahead with it. 32570e8ac85561afc1f59712301ee80c0d69d2b3 The one-line summary doesn't mention anything about syntax changes, but the detailed commit message makes it clear. Moral of the story? pay more attention to patch countdowns, I guess. I wouldn't be adverse to asking developers to clearly state a syntax change in the 50-character summary (although this gets tricky; maybe simply adding "(syntax)" would be ok?)... but at the end of the day, the patch went through the countdown. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel