On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: >> Given that Cmake has a large following (examples include KDE and >> LLVM), I'd be comfortable with switching to that. > > Interesting; have you ever used Cmake?
Lately I've been doing tweaks to parallel compilations of LLVM (cmake) and GCC (autoconf + GNU make + some bizarre templating), and the Cmake one is the one which gave less headaches. >From a general perspective, choosing something that has a larger following is a smarter choice, since it is likely that others have already dealt with most of the obvious problems. If I lived in an ideal world, I'd write a build-system from scratch (and maybe some day, I will). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
