2011/8/16 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > We're up to 59 patches now, plus 17 patches on the "plz review; no > known problems" list. We're losing ground quickly, and this will > soon become a serious problem for developers and contributors (if > it isn't already). > I see three options, none of which fill me with joy. > > 1) encourage more pushing without reviews. > 2) assign certain people to be in charge of certain areas (e.g. > Carl has final say over anything beaming-related), and encourage > that person to review+push patches in his area ASAP. > 3) double or triple the rate of patches in the countdown. > > Out of those options, I dislike #3 the least. I'm thinking of > having 10 patches per countdown, 48 hours for each countdown. I > know that's a lot of reviewing, but if we want to keep the > opportunity for reviews, that's the kind of workload we need to > handle.
+1 cheers, Janek 2011/8/16 Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu>: > That said, I find that there is a positive correlation between the amount of > my music that gets played / paid / enjoyed and the amount of development I do > for LilyPond (I have no clue how this works, as in theory this means I have > less time, but oh well!). So, I don't anticipate stopping my quest to > eliminate all collisions[1] from LilyPond in the near future. :D _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
