On 8/17/11 5:35 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > So it would seem like another worthwhile frog task to get rid of > SCM_CDRLOC in the source tree when feasible (when the list is being > consulted front-to-back while it is in the process of being created, > this would not be possible. However, since tail pointers in this manner > can't be kept around beyond the function call, chances are that we have > very few such cases if at all). > > It will simplify the code, make it more readable and faster, and > decrease the amount of stack scanning that can go wrong. And there are only 29 occurrences, so it's a smaller task the the task of rationalizing the guile interface. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
