2011/8/17 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > Bertrand Bordage <bordage.bertr...@gmail.com> writes: > > > This would be great if Han-Wen decides to keep it like that. > > Otherwise there is really a lot of work, with many shortcuts to > > define. > > to_boolean (scm_is_pair (x)) > > That one would be wrong since scm_is_pair already returns a C boolean. >
I was thinking about scm_pair_p ()... This is typically the kind of mistakes that should be solved. Shame on me, I won't do it again. Where did you find SCM_CONSP ? I don't see it in guile's reference. Maybe something to add to the CG ? Bertrand
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
