Hi Mike, Have you tested this with broken tuplets? I've tried adding breaks at random in tuplet-nest.ly and get collisions in some cases.
Cheers, Neil http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/2001/input/regression/tuplet-nest.ly File input/regression/tuplet-nest.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/2001/input/regression/tuplet-nest.ly#newcode15 input/regression/tuplet-nest.ly:15: \times 2/3 { c8 [c8 c8 ]} { c8[ c c] } etc. http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/2001/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/2001/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode685 lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:685: If this function is over-ridden, this may lead to bizarre results... Would it be feasible to remove the centring from ly:tuplet-number::print and use a callback for X-offset instead? http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/2001/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode687 lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:687: Stencil *my_number_stencil = unsmob_stencil (Text_interface::print (me->get_object ("tuplet-number"))); unsmob_stencil (Text_interface::print (my_number)); http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
