Graham, you wrote Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:48 PM
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:32:01AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Don't get me wrong. Whether we place these issues in a
critical category or not is hardly a vital decision, but here
we're talking about deciding Policy. Policy decisions
must be based on sound and justifiable arguments, not
opinion or expediency. So my concern is that we are not
following a sufficiently sound approach here.
Completely agreed! I've taken a stab at this with the "stamp of
approval" concept of a release -- please take a look at the
updated GOP-PROP 8...(probable decision) and let me know what you
think.
Well, OK, it's a better point, if a little
contrived :) I can live with it, though.
Let's move on. The key point is dropping
the priority field and replacing it with
the stars, and I like that.
Trevor
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3825 - Release Date: 08/10/11
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
