Hello, )usually it's longer). I noticed that when i have too many issues open )(including Frog's issues which i 'supervise' and upload to Rietveld), i'm )getting confused; i cannot remember what's going on where (because )discussions last for a long time) and so on. )Therefore i have to wait until some issues are closed - currently i'm not )doing anything because i don't want more mess in my mind :) )
Which is why tracker items are important for issues and why I open a tracker for a Rietveld issue another dev has created if I think it is going to be significant, or if I have had to run more than one reg test or if it has more than half a dozen updates from the dev - which implies it is important enough to warrant a lot of time. It probably annoys some because they then feel obligated but this is where I think GOP 8 blurs over to GOP 7. I get a bit exhausted keeping track of it all which is a negative thing, and I know that devs would get a bit exhausted creating 'two' issues (Tracker and Rietveld) and may then feel they have to update both now it seems I am making more work for them when in fact I am just trying to keep track of it to help and Rietveld is abysmal for this. We don't have a GOP for 'isn't there a better way to keep track of issues AND upload patches' I see though. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
