On 7/30/11 5:34 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> We have somebody willing to work on this stuff. He's twiddling > his thumbs until we get the basic guidelines down. Of course > there will be technical implementation problems to work out later, > but I'm really hoping that he can start work; it's been a month! > > Are there any problems with those guidelines? If you disagree > with a point (or if I have not convinced you that you should > accept the proposal), please speak up. If you would like to add a > point, please speak up. > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html > > LGTM. If we get this infrastructure in place, we can later look at appropriate logging levels (as in Reinhold's new patch) to be added to the build tree. But I can see no reason not to start on the behavior described in GOP-PROP 5. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
