On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:27:39PM +0000, James Lowe wrote: > ... and could those same author's change it to 'Patch New' (not > jump to 'Patch Review') if they'd like me to re-check the make > and reg tests.
Sure, but you're never responsible for anything that's already "patch-review". Attached is a really crummy flowchart of the process. If somebody "jumps the queue" by putting something directly into patch-review, that's not your concern. Cheers, - Graham
patches-review-bad.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
