A pdf proof file is attached to tracker issue http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1767 The gap in smallest font sizes was reduced according to Bertrand's suggestion, and the line height was increased just a bit according to my friend's suggestion. I don't feel strong about these changes; for me both this version and previous version is good enough (and definately better than current Lily).
http://codereview.appspot.com/4748044/diff/1/mf/feta-noteheads.mf File mf/feta-noteheads.mf (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4748044/diff/1/mf/feta-noteheads.mf#newcode181 mf/feta-noteheads.mf:181: % when there is an interval of fourth. On 2011/07/27 05:03:15, lemzwerg wrote:
Wouldn't it be simpler to explicitly specify the line length instead
of using
such a complicated algorithm? I mean a global variable to be added to
the
various feta-noteheadsXX.mf files. I know that none of the existing
size driver
files contain such a variable except the standard assignment of
`design_size',
but this shouldn't stop you to add something since it would be the
logical place
to add. Cf. similar control files in other MF fonts like TeX's
Computer Modern,
which are full of such meta-variables.
Aww, i was so proud of this code... Frankly, i don't think we will gain anything from defining a global value. The algorithm i wrote is a bit complicated, but i thinks is easier to understand than what you suggest (if i understood your suggestion correctly). It keeps things in one place instead of values flying all around (at least that's how i see it). http://codereview.appspot.com/4748044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
