On 2011/07/25 11:18:28, James.Lowe_datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
)-----Original Message----- )From: mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of mailto:m...@apollinemike.com )Sent: 24 July 2011 09:41 )To: mts...@gmail.com; n.putt...@gmail.com; )lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com; pkx1...@gmail.com; lilypond- )de...@gnu.org; mailto:re...@codereview.appspotmail.com )Subject: Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget )to document a property. (issue4801045) ) )On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:05 AM, mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: ) )> Can you give me an idea what his does and how to test this or what
I
)> am going to see as someone who runs a lot of make/reg tests? )> ) )Try adding an undocumented property to an interface (i.e. add "foo"
to
)the Stem interface) and then run make. Before, make would throw an )error about procedure-name when building internals.texi. Now, it
will still
)throw that error, but before that, it'll explicitly mention that
"foo" is
)undocumented, allowing for one to then document it. ) )Cheers, )MS
Thanks, for this information. I'll try to run the test tonight - I ran
out of
time yesterday - so I can see what it looks like when it does what it
is
supposed to do, using Neil's 'broken' patch.
James
Pushed as 922d59a242646c2488738d77263580427bd7764b. Cheers, MS http://codereview.appspot.com/4801045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
