On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
>> Hey Han-Wen,
>> I've been bumping into this problem recently :
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1645
>> and I think the solution is in the quanting code. Before I spend an hour
>
> How would a collision strategy work? Since this situation is
> symmetric, any solution within the current framework would be
> cyclical. You could break the tie by having the top adjust to the
> bottom (or vice versa), but I think people expect to get a symmetric
> resolution in cases like these.
>
> --
> Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
How is it symmetric? I could see it being symmetric if the two beams risked
bumping into each other, but here, all the beams need to avoid are notes.
Check out:
<<
{ \autoBeamOff a'32 a' a' a' }
\\
{ c''[ d'' d'' d''] }
>>
Cheers,
MS_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
