On 24 July 2011 09:55, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> Why is it a bad thing to do it this way? Currently, the > Beam_collision_engraver implements dynamic filtering based on interface, and > I don't think there's a problem with that (it is the only way to make it > ignore certain grobs on the fly). I don't like the name. We already have `core interfaces'; they're grob-interface, item-interface and spanner-interface. > Creating a new interface would be OK but would make it harder to filter out > interfaces on the fly (people would have to override a grob's "meta" > property, which seems hard). Do you have a scenario whereby a user might want to override this? Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
