To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; "Ian Hulin" <i...@hulin.org.uk> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:11 PM Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable decision)
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:32:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hulin" <i...@hulin.org.uk> To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 12:33 PM Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable decision) >1+ for Graham's proposal, provided his bin target acts as a synonym for >exe, and builds all the stuff in out/bin. If we go with my proposal (which is nice and simple as a starter) it will simply remake the .exe if any file in \lily is changed. This strikes me as a handy first step and would speed the development process up.I like it.>Graham, what are the time estimates for adding a top-level make target >for developer who's a build-system virgin?For a build-system virgin -- which you don't qualify as, since you already a bit about build systems -- I'd say 2 hours. For you, maybe 1 hour.It'd take me about 5 minutes.I'm calling it 30 minutes, including testing, patch for review, revising the patch to accommodate comments, testing+uploading new patch, etc. Start your stopwatch. :) Cheers, - Graham
Patch attached. Not convinced it's worth a Rietveld for essentially one line? Works on my system.
-- Phil Holmes
0001-Creates-make-bin-command.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
