On 2011/07/20 16:04:23, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 20 July 2011 16:36, mailto:m...@apollinemike.com
<mailto:m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to doubt the viability of my local build...the regtests
went off
without a hitch.
I wouldn't worry about that. Uninitialized members often work fine; it might depend on your architecture.
> I'll look into emending the pure height function.
I've just tested both versions, and there are minor differences in spacing (though nothing serious AFAICT).
Cheers, Neil
The Stem_tremolo::pure_height function is now pure. Works AFAICT. I'm hitting the sack (longest LilyPond day ever...I <3 glissando stems) - if anyone is up for a late night regtest, go for it. Cheers, MS http://codereview.appspot.com/4754054/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
