On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround >> I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached >> to #1724 ? >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724 > > Let me think about it for a bit. I have an idea using a scheme > engraver which might work. > >> PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the >> consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to >> understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue. > > You're welcome to add snippets to it rather than relying on the links > to the merged issues (we could also mention the Dynamics context in > the issue title). > > Cheers, > Neil >
I ran into the exact same thing in a score I'm working on and proposed a patch to devel - lemme know what ya'll think! Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
