On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:20:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <gra...@percival-music.ca> > >On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 02:20:51PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > >I'm not certain if it's possible to cause make(1) to automatically > >put its output into a logfile in addition to the console. > > From my reading of the manual, there is no option to redirect > make output to a logfile. I always do this with a command line > redirect. AFAICS the only other way to do this would be to wrap > make in another program that captures its output to log and > console - Kili wrote something like this. However, I'm > personally rather loathe to do such wrapping.
Good point. Ok, I've modified the proposal accordingly. > >>I think there should be an option to turn it all back on if you want > >>- a sort of inverse of QUIET_BUILD. We should also get rid of the > >>QUIET_BUILD variable completely. > > > >Agreed. Maybe using the V=1 thing that Jan was talking about? > > That sort of thing. I'd propose a variable called VERBOSE that > would have to be set to get the output on screen. I think we should use whatever variable is normally used for this task. That may well be VERBOSE, but if it's something else, I think we should use that something else. Or maybe it's normally done with either VERBOSE or V ? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
