On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:28:00AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > > > But we're not talking about GNU code. We're talking about > > lilypond code, > > When did Lilypond stop to be a GNU project?
*sigh* I was interpreting "GNU code" to mean "code which strictly follows the GNU guidelines". LilyPond code has not done this for years (just look at the 1-meg-plus diff you get from running emacs-indentation on our source tree). If you interpret "GNU code" to be "code from a GNU project", then ok, we have GNU code. But then apparently GNU code is not necessarily formatted in the GNU style. Could we drop vague terms like "GNU formatting" (since it's not really defined), "GNU code", and the like? The bottom line is: - lilypond contains C++ code. - we want to insist that this C++ follows any particular style - we want to have an automatic way of producing this style - which tool(s) shall we use to do this? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
