On Jul 4, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 4 July 2011 15:31, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: >> Would a redundant check of settings from default context definitions be a >> problem? I can't imagine that such a check would take 1% of the processing >> time. > > I don't know, though I agree is unlikely to be a significant overhead. > >> Plus, I don't think it's really a redundant check; I think it's a real >> check. Absent such a check, we're trusting on the *-init.ly files being >> correct, which admits a potential programming error. > > The *-init.ly files are covered by regression testing since > -dcheck-internal-types triggers an assertion error for incorrect > context property settings. > > Cheers, > Neil >
Just to get the ball rolling on this, were I to start on a patch that implements this sort of settings checking, where would be a good place to start? I know where the context mods are set and where the properties are set, but I don't know how the layout block escapes this checking. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
