Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011, 17:33:33 schrieb Graham Percival: > I'd like to be able to tell "expert users" that the easiest way > for them improve the documentation is by adding snippets, and that > these would be added to our docs in a timely fashion. But if > we're looking at an average of 1 import every 2 months, it seems a > bit dishonest to encourage LSR use [as a way to get stuff into the > docs -- of course LSR can function on its own].
Okay, you are simply seeing LSR as an input pipe for doc material. I see it as a very useful, separate entity, which provides a quick, searchable FAQ, which is able to display just the requested information in an easy way. > Hence this email. I don't want to deal with LSR. I want to dump > it all on Phil. I'd also like to have timely imports, which IMO > means weekly (or at least 2-weekly). > > Anybody disagree with the previous paragraph? No. (Of course, it all depends on Phil, whether we wants that stuff dumped onto him...) Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
