Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes: > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> wrote: > >> If the flexible-vertical-spacing variable 'stretchability is defined, but > >> has value 0.0, then > >> a) the staves will not stretch to fill extra space > >> b) the staves will not compress, making basic-distance serve as > >> minimum-distance > >> c) some people expect padding to be ignored, per Carl's comment on issue > >> 1654
> I'll make sure that there are simple ways to get (b) and (c) without the > stretchability=0 switch. Well, the obvious b) minimum-distance >= basic-distance to prevent compression c) padding=0 to remove padding works pretty robustly. > I'll remove the stretchability==0 special case in my patch for issue 1669. > However, there were some other fixes required to get compressibility working correctly, so I separated the restoration of independent compressibility into a separate patch, visible at <http://codereview.appspot.com/4517136/> for the interested. I'll raise a tracker report after sleeping on it a while. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
