On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:09:53PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > In trying to nail down the notorious #1562, I started a ghostscript-9.0 > branch in GUB, which uses ghostscript 9.02, freetype-2.4.4 and includes > a small ghostscript installer fixlet. > > It would be nice if you could find a time to include these into > the release branch or master.
Sorry, but I don't think that would be a good idea. We've just reached 0 Critical bugs again, so I'll be making a new Release Candidate (Carl: I can handle the backporting, probably, enjoy your vacation). This is not the right time to switch a bunch of build requirements. Remember that 2.14.0 is drastically late and the delay has caused huge problems. I think the best thing is to get 2.14.0 out now, include a warning that it doesn't work on windows 7 SP1 but that we're testing a fix and hope to have a new version out soon. Then we switch to ghostscript-9.0 in 2.15.0 and start testing. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
