On 2011/04/12 18:38:11, Keith wrote:
On 2011/04/12 12:55:01, dak wrote:
Only to assure us humans that F-natural was not a mistake.
I think writing f! is a mistake then, because it assures Lilypond that
f-natural should be spelled out. Assurances for humans belong in
comments, not in code that coincidentally happens to do nothing.
\version "2.13.60" % because 2.12.0 gets the fis wrong
> \new Staff \relative c' {
> \key e\major
> \clef treble
> cis dis! f
> \clef bass
> <c dis fis>
> }
>
The e\major version tests less.
I was, among other things, trying to make sense of your example. The
dis got a reminder accidental to show that an in-key explicit reminder
will also properly be forgotten and consequently not repeated later.
Whatever. I guess I'll use your proposal without the exclamation mark.
There seems little point in haggling days on end about a regtest.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4384050/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
