On Apr 6, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> mts...@gmail.com wrote Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:35 PM
>
>
>> I'd like to get this pushed in the next 24 hours if possible (which will
>> require 2 LGTMs). This way, << { c'8 [ s c' ] } \\ { s c''8 s } >> will
>> be prettier.
>
> Here's one. LGTM.
>
> It certainly improves the revised regtest, but
> I don't see any change in the example above.
> Should I?
>
> Trevor
Sorry, I meant << { c'8 [ s c' ] } \\ { s \stemUp a'8 s } >>
One more LGTM & issue 795 can be retired. Alternatively, if you think I
shouldn't push, lemme know!
I've tweaked the patch slightly after my most recent push (added one line to
define-grobs.scm to account for the stem-interface), so if you want to run the
regtesets, make sure to work from that most recent version.
Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
