Begin forwarded message:

> From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng <hhpmu...@163.com>
> Date: March 24, 2011 8:36:47 AM EDT
> To: "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com>
> Subject: Re:Re: LilyPond and visually impaired accessibility
> 
> Ah, if it's possible, just do a musicxml backend. Because braille music is 
> more flexible than Lilypond, so just use musicxml. Musicxml can be translated 
> into braille with different formatting used by different countries. For 
> example, 27 lines X 34 cells is Chinese layout, but 27*32 or 25*40 is US 
> convention, and in Italy, 30*40! Therefore, using braille backend for 
> Lilypond is very difficult.
>   Of course, Lilypond's braille backend is very useful to the blind musician. 
> Currently, there's no tool handling braille to print music well. Italian 
> scientists made Braille Music Editor, but it's not so good. Although it can 
> output musicxml, the scoring is very limited. You can only use 5-line staves, 
> and you can't edit page formattings. With Lilypond, all are solved, but blind 
> people need to check their scores in braille using a freshable braille 
> display. Sometimes the midi output should be better using a notation 
> program's vst plugin, so importing Lily's xml into Sibelius is a good thing. 
> For example, currently I can only learn sequencing to make a better output of 
> my overture, but if I can import musicxml into Sibelius, the music will sound 
> much better than using a soundfont with Lily's poor midi output. A professor 
> is willing to help me to let this music performed, but I think a well-sounded 
> sample is necessary.
> 
> Regards
> Haipeng
> 
> 
> 

Hey all,

One of my goals for 2011 is to improve LilyPond's accessibility for the blind.

I got this response from Haipeng (who currently has to rely on LilyPond's 
playback to catch errors) and I get the sense that the best option would be 
creating a primitive form of lily -> musicxml conversion.  Even if this cannot 
encapsulate the full richness of LilyPond, I think that it is the best solution 
that can help the most people.

Before I start working on this (I estimate it'd be 10 hours of my time to get a 
prototype for a simple line of music), I want to get your feedback on its 
utility.  Does this seem like a good approach?  I've brought this up on the 
French list before and it seems like there are 2 people who could help out w/ 
the Scheme coding to get this thing up and running.

Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to