On 2011/03/20 07:45:11, Keith wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:17:48 -0700, Joe Neeman
<mailto:joenee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:58 PM, <mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net>
wrote:
> > In that case, is there any need to set after_affinity at all? > I could ask the author of the original code the same question :)
Surely you aren't asking me to understand code I wrote months ago? :P
I think yes. As commentary. It assures the reader that LilyPond is proceeding as if after_affinity
were
changed.
Wouldn't a comment be better then? The current discussion suggests that redundant code can actually create confusion... http://codereview.appspot.com/4278058/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
