On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, <mts...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> this still supposes that there is just one fixed amount of >> >> featheriness? >> >> You're right. >> I'm honestly not sure exactly how feathering effects this function. All >> of the tests I'm running seem to pass just fine, so I'm not sure if this >> function needs detailed feathering info. Can you think of a case where >> this function will fail given the new feathering? I've been running >> stuff like this: >> > > See beam.cc- > > /* > feather dir = 1 , relx 0->1 : factor 0 -> 1 > feather dir = 0 , relx 0->1 : factor 1 -> 1 > feather dir = -1, relx 0->1 : factor 1 -> 0 > */ > Real feather_factor = 1; > if (feather_dir > 0) > feather_factor = relx; > else if (feather_dir < 0) > feather_factor = 1 - relx; > > it assumes the feathering is fulll across the x range. I suspect that > the stem lengths mismatch the beams in broken beam cases. Try setting > beam-thickness really small and see if the stems reach up to the > beams.
I don't see any difference...
\new Staff <<
\relative c' {
\cadenzaOn
\override Staff . TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\override Voice . Beam #'breakable = ##t
\override Voice . Beam #'beam-thickness = #0.1
\override Beam #'breakable = ##t
\once \override Voice . Beam #'feather-direction = #'(1.0 . 0.0)
a32[ b c d e f g a ]
\once \override Voice . Beam #'feather-direction = #'(0.75 . 0.0)
a,32[ b c d e f8 g a ]
\once \override Voice . Beam #'feather-direction = #'(0.5 . 0.1)
a32[ b c d e f g a ]
\once \override Voice . Beam #'feather-direction = #'(0.5 . 0.1)
a32[ b c d e \bar "" \break f g a ]
\once \override Voice . Beam #'feather-direction = #'(1.0 . 0.5)
a32[ b c d e \bar "" \break f g a ]
} >>
<<inline: endpoint-test.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
