Am 28.02.2011 um 14:21 schrieb pkx1...@gmail.com: > One comment. > > Thanks for your time. > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/diff/6002/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely > File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/diff/6002/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode427 > Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:427: @end lilypond > Apologies for my ignorance on fretted music, but is there a reason we > need both the \ottava #1 and the \clef "treble_8" functions in this? > > That is, can we omit one/all of them and still make the example make > sense? Hm, we could omit all of them but this might be confusing for guitarists. Guitarists normally read music as if there were a "treble_8" even when there is a "treble"-clef. I probably included the \ottava #1 in one of my first snippets to avoid very high notes. But in this case it is not really necessary, indeed!
Thanks, patrick > > I know it seems trivial but it does make the @lilypond even simpler and > more compact. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/ > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
