Something good happened recently, [lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly GNU LilyPond 2.13.46 real 34m1.356s user 33m7.193s sys 0m4.798s
GNU LilyPond 2.13.52 real 11m17.441s user 10m39.727s sys 0m4.129s Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and would be fairly called a significant change. I was too lazy to git bisect and git blame, but I have my suspicions Subject: Re: Various caching optimizations during pure-height calculations.
LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/4129043/
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel