Something good happened recently,

[lily@OHara dvorak]$ time lilypond M*.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.46
real    34m1.356s
user    33m7.193s
sys     0m4.798s

GNU LilyPond 2.13.52
real    11m17.441s
user    10m39.727s
sys     0m4.129s

Those timings were for the score of a four-movement symphony, and would be 
fairly called a significant change.  I was too lazy to git bisect and git 
blame, but I have my suspicions

Subject: Re: Various caching optimizations during pure-height calculations.
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4129043/


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to