> The patch works fine, but the documentation could be improved.
agreed.
> Expanding the example in a different section to show \inversion is not
> optimal.
sorry, I don't get that.
> We need an @lilypond{} immediately after the @example showing
> the syntax in the Inversion section.
>
> Also, with this addition, it would be sensible to take \retrograde out
> of the Modal transformations section and place it in a section of its
> own, like Inversion.
agreed.
> All this could be done in a separate patch I guess, so LGTM.
should I move retrograde into its own section now or is there a
volunteer who can improve the documentation on transpose and
inversion as well after pushing as is?
p
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
