2011/2/21 Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com>: > Can you make your code be less hardcoded? I propose something like: > > factor = (1+abs(hp[dir])) / (2*staff_radius + 1) > shorten *= min(factor, 1.0)
What staff_radius is? I tried to find an explanation, but to no avail... > this way, it will work with other types of staves too. If you want to > be extra fancy, you could do > > factor = pow(factor, shorten_concavity) > > for some number != 1 to tune shape of the transition. I think it's not necassary. Btw, i think that using a power here wouldn't give good results. If we really wanted to control the shape of the transition, we would need some other function (perhaps a little sophisticated one). 2011/2/21 Bernard Hurley <bern...@marcade.biz>: > It took me a loooong time see any difference between the two alternatives. > Having done so, I think I prefer alternative 1. Either would be in > improvement over current behaviour. :) I also prefer 1. thanks, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
