Hi Ian, Please see my new comment regarding this patch (below).
Thanks, Patrick http://codereview.appspot.com/2219044/diff/25001/scm/display-lily.scm File scm/display-lily.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2219044/diff/25001/scm/display-lily.scm#newcode34 scm/display-lily.scm:34: Jan recently removed all of the curried definitions that were affected by this conditional (use-modules ...) call. I just compiled LilyPond (and the patch queue from my "guile" branch) against Guile 2.0 *without* this part of your patch, and I didn't run into any issues. In other words, you can safely remove this chunk from your patch. http://codereview.appspot.com/2219044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
