On 2011/02/15 07:15:48, Trevor Daniels wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4160048/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode2211
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:2211: To avoid this problem, the
time
signature can be set in only one I still prefer "should"
I don't want to say "should" because that can be interpreted as an "all the time" prescription. I've reworded it to say "One way to avoid this problem is to set the time signature in only one staff". I've thought about "when" vs. "whenever". I prefer "when". I don't know if it's a UK vs. US thing, or just a Carl vs. Trevor thing. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/4160048/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
