2011/1/19 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:32:21PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: >> 2011/1/19 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: >> >it's no problem for me to recompile lilypond >> > 30 or 40 times. >> >> Finding a commit out of 40 by git-bisect shouldn't need to recompile >> more than log2(40)=5.32 , this gives 6 times in the worst case. > > We've had more than 40 commits between 2.12.3 and 2.13.46. > Granted, it's probably less than a billion. I guess that "12 to > 14 times" would have been a better estimate.
Oops, you're right. Namely, 13 as a worst case is the figure. There is no 2.12.3 tag in master; there are 2.12.2-1 01ceb9ac (4469 commits until 2.13.46), and 2.13.0-0 f1f15cd97 (4348 commits until 2.13.46). -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
