On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:51:19 -0800, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
I've pushed this patch, but isn't the immediately preceding text misleading, in that it says, "The following example demonstrates the two ways these alists can be modified. The first declaration updates one key-value individually, and the second completely re-defines the property:"?
Trevor, and list, Follow-up patch attached. The misleading bit was the implication that the properties always contain alists, when one of them is by default a function returning whichever alist is appropriate depending on whether the staff is in a group. This patch tells the truth about staff-staff-spacing, and amends an example to use the simpler default-staff-staff-spacing so that readers can use the grouped/ungrouped examples in the same file. -Keith
0001-Doc-NR-spacing.itely-Clarify-un-gropued-staves.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
