On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:50:57PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > With this change, I see a dramatic change in font size -- the > > vertical length of the post-font-name "p" is less than half of the > > vertical length of the pre-font-name "p". > > Yes. However, it doesn't matter IMHO. On the console, lilypond > reports the same font size, and this should be checked in the > regression test, nothing else.
I see. I think I misunderstood your description of the change -- when I compile the current regtest, I see no unusual output (at least, not with a typical "lilypond font-name-font-size.ly" invocation). If the console output is the only thing that matters, could the texidoc reflect this? I don't want helpful bug volunteers trying to figure out what's (apparently) wrong with the graphical output, if in fact nothing is wrong. > > Should it be an error instead? > > An error indicating what? in configure -- if fontconfig < 201005xy, die with an error, instead of merely giving a warning. I proposed this because I thought that your system (which I'm guessing has fontconfig 201005 or higher) produced different graphical output than mine. It seems that this isn't relevant, so ignore this suggestion. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
