On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:55:55AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > I'd rather we just use > #(regtest:expext_warning (_ "Some particular warning")) > > before the line being the eventual cause of some expected warning, and > ly:warning get hijacked, matching the expected warnings to the given > warnings, and complaining at the end of the run in case any expected > warnings did not turn up.
Nice idea; added as: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1477 Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
