On 1/8/11 12:52 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 January 2011 19:48, Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> wrote: > >> I ran all of the regtests and nothing breaks. > > This is not good enough. > > You *must* do a proper regression test comparison. As defined in the CG, this means: Run make test-baseline before applying patches. Run make check after applying patches. Then check the results found in out/test-results/index.html See C.G. section 9.4. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Fixing issue 37 with extra position callback (issue3... Carl . D . Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Mike Solomon
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... m...@apollinemike.com
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Mike Solomon
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... David Kastrup
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... Neil Puttock
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Keith OHara
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... Mike Solomon
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Carl . D . Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Carl . D . Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position cal... Mike Solomon
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Carl . D . Sorensen
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... k-ohara5a5a
- Re: Fixing issue 37 with extra position callbac... Keith OHara