On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:15:22AM +0000, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:37:35PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote: > > " > > Priority-Critical: LilyPond segfaults, a regression (see below) > > against a previous stable version or a regression against a fix > > developed for this version. This does not apply where the > > "regression" occurred because a feature was removed deliberately - > > this is not a bug. > > " > > I'm not certain what "regression against a fix developed for this > version" means.
Addendum: remember that any breakage in the regression tests is a Critical issue. So if this was an important fix or new feature, then the programmer should have added a regtest, and any breakage in that regtest would be a critical bug regardless of any text like "regression against a fix developed for this version". It's probably worth adding something about regtest breakage to the policy. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
