2010/12/31 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > > I think I agree, but this rule does not agree with the engraving books. So > if we go this way we're breaking new ground. That makes me nervous. I > certainly wouldn't want to do this without get agreement from a larger > number of the core developers.
Hi! Sorry I'm not a guru of engraving practices, nor a core developer (not even a developer). But I have a general thought, Janek. All the examples you show us are very simple minimal examples consisting of repeating the same note and/or scales. In real-life scores there is a melody and notes are usually going up and down (not randomly but you see what I mean). Also we usually have a mix of beamed and unbeamed, sometimes mix of single voice / polyphony and I'm not sure your minimal examples take this into account. Hence the reference to engraving books and/or what reputable editions do, simply because that's what a musician is used to (or should, since we now find more and more poorly engraved scores using "famous" proprietary softwares). Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
