On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:54:38 -0800, <tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
[...]I would prefer to see the original example retained to show in the starkest fashion how staves should be changed manually, with this one added later to show the possibility of collisions.
That's a better way to do it. The attached patch reverts the original example, and is a simple addition of one @lilypond and one paragraph. Carl started this issue for me, and I think it best to stay on his issue number for continuity. Carl will probably upload the patch to his issue for me, but we can't expect that to happen too soon. No need to wait for the upload, though, because this simple patch is human-readable. The new example involves the types of collisions that I see most often. Tell me if the resolutions of the ugly collisions, the pitched rests and commented use of staff-padding, needs any extra description in the text. -Keith
<<attachment: lily-a9fbc874.png>>
0001-patch-from-issue-3782042.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
