On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> BTW: since we are effectively distributing a full-blown GNU/Linux >> distro, we might want to consider naming it differently; as things >> currently are, I'm afraid we're committing a trademark infringement of >> sorts: > > Mao. > > > Ok, Jonathan: you're making this thing, so you have final say on > the name. Based on the discussion, I would recommend: > - don't mention "virtual", since you can of course install > lilybuntu in a dual-boot (or even single-boot) system. > - I don't recommend going for a generic name like "frog linux"; we > should be clear that this is for lilypond. > - I don't recommend simply calling it "lilypond linux", since some > people might think that you need this thing just to run > lilypond. > > I still slightly favor something like "u-lily-contrib", but the > final decision is officially yours. Let's call the next version > 1.0, and Valentin will delete the "infringing" iso names from his > files.lilynet.net once we have the new version. >
This is not a distro, it's just a re-spin. I haven't changed any artwork, branding or other distro-like stuff. The only reference to lilybuntu is the filename, which is easy to change. It's Ubuntu for lily devs and I'll come up with a filename that reflects that. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
