On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > There might even be an argument for adding something > which made compilation fail - in a way that clearly > indicated the problem, of course.
Bold idea... or insane, I can't decide which one it is. :-) Anyway, this whole insert-comments thing is now known as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1387 Meanwhile, do I have your LGTM to push my regexp patch? Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
