Comments actioned and tested with LilyPond using Guile V1.8.7 and
V1.9.13.
Ian
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm
File scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#oldcode20
scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:20: (define define-ly-syntax
define-public)
On 2010/10/08 05:00:01, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Instead of removing this definition (like I did), would it be possible
to use a
macro here? Something like
(defmacro define-ly-syntax (args . body)
`(define-public ,args ,body))
This is untested.
Tests out OK with V1.9 and V1.8.7
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm
File scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#newcode27
scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:27: `(define-public ,args
On 2010/10/08 05:00:01, Patrick McCarty wrote:
I forgot why I changed this...
Is there a reason why "primitive-eval" was used here in the first
place?
Both Guile V1.8.7 and V1.9 work without it. I assume it was cruft left
over from Guile V1.6 compatibility.
Ian
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/diff/1/scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm#newcode250
scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm:250: (define-public (partial parser
location dur)
On 2010/10/08 05:00:01, Patrick McCarty wrote:
This part needs to be rebased against current master.
Sorted out in new patch-set
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2313044/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
