On 4 October 2010 00:19, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:

> Is it a bug, or just different ordering of the output?  The warnings are
> proper, aren't they?
>
> Can't we just say the warnings have reversed order, so that the changes in
> the regtest output can be ignored?

I think users will expect warning messages to appear in parsing order.

This is more important for markup, since the warning message doesn't
tell you where in the file the error occurred.

Cheers,
Neil

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to