David Kastrup wrote: >>> Should be easy enough to do for the TeX backends, >>> effectively wrapping every @code inside of a @w. Is >>> that desirable? >> >> I consider it desirable, but I'm not the only person >> involved. :) Maybe wait a few days before doing a lot of >> work, in case anybody complains, then please do so. >> >> (or, if it's a 10-minute job, please do so now, post the >> patch, and then we'll see what happens) > > The code is likely a one-liner if done correctly, but I > already spent 10 minutes digging through the details. > > So I'll turn to wait mode right now.
This work may have already been done by the texinfo developers; I told them about it some months ago. IIRC, the @w trick works for info and pdf, and the html version is fixed in the texinfo sources, but I don't think they've released a stable version that includes that change, and I didn't have time to go learn CVS. See this post before you get too involved: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2010-04/msg00014.html - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
