LGTM, although I didn't check that it still compiles.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2217046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2217046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode142 Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:142: Why the extra newline ? I mean, it doesn't hurt anything, but all the other @item's [sic] don't have any extra lines between the @item and the text, and that's what the doc policy says to do. http://codereview.appspot.com/2217046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely File Documentation/notation/repeats.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2217046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely#newcode682 Documentation/notation/repeats.itely:682: The same output can be obtained by adding @samp{:@var{number}} Why is this @samp instead of @code? (I totally agree that the previous @q{} was wrong) http://codereview.appspot.com/2217046/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
